Mary Ellen Stanek Addresses Baird Advisors Institutional Investors Conference
KOHLER, Wis., September 11, 2017 – For the 18th straight year, Baird Advisors held its Institutional Investors Conference in Kohler, Wisconsin. Attendees listened to legendary Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward's perspective on the Trump White House in the context of previous administrations he has covered and to global risk expert Ian Bremmer, President and founder of Eurasia Group who introduced the concept of a geopolitical recession and mapped a new macroeconomic landscape where the institutions that defined the post-war world order are becoming less relevant.
Additionally, in what has become a feature at the annual conference, Baird Advisors Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer Mary Ellen Stanek, CFA provided the group's annual investment outlook. Stanek explained that Baird Advisors, which manages $57.5 billion in fixed income assets using a consistent and predictable approach, believes the economy will remain in a period of expansion that is remarkable for its longevity, but not its magnitude. "We believe the same two words continue in prominence," she said: "Lower and longer."
While making the case for sustained, steady growth, Stanek also identified a handful of structural headwinds that have limited the expansion and could create challenges for fixed-income market participants. Following are the highlights of her remarks:
The Case for Lower and Longer
At 98 months and counting, the current U.S. economic expansion is already the third longest since World War II. It's also one of the weakest, with average GDP growth of 2.1%, less than half that of other recent U.S. expansions (though it is notable that this growth rate is well above that of Europe, the U.K. and Japan). We think this lower, longer theme has legs and have reason to believe the expansion ultimately could break the post-war record of 120 months set over the course of most of the 1990s.
Consumers are feeling it
The most powerful tailwind for the economy may be buoyant U.S. consumer. Consumer confidence and small business optimism gauges are at or near multidecade peaks. Regardless of one's political leanings, one thing is clear: the 2016 change election brought U.S. consumers a burst of optimism. And with consumers representing nearly 70% of U.S. economic activity, sentiment matters.
Risk factor: There are signs – a weakening U.S. dollar and falling 10-year Treasury yields, for example – that the "Trump-bump" is fading somewhat, as a new Administration that campaigned on regulatory rollback, infrastructure spending, tax-reform, and repeal of the Affordable Care Act, runs into the realities of governing. But, so far, consumers show no sign of returning to a pre-Trump state of funk.
Jobs data is solid
U.S. nonfarm payroll figures are on seven-year positive streak and unemployment is 4.4%, well under the six percent or so considered "full employment." Just as telling, a high underemployment rate and lower labor force participation – both lingering aftershocks of the 2008 financial collapse that have acted as a drag on the economy – show signs of reverting to historical norms. Slowly but steadily, significant slack is being taken out of the jobs market.
Risk factor: Tight labor markets can spark inflation and investors should be keeping an eye on wage data. However, there are secular forces helping to keep a lid on inflation: i) Baby Boomers are retiring – or better yet, from an inflation standpoint, remaining in the workforce, thankful to have a job with benefits and in no hurry to demand wage increases; and ii) technology advances mean that tightness in the jobs market is more likely to be met with investments in robots as opposed to higher wages. For now even as wages have firmed slightly, overall consumer inflation remains at a benign 1.4%, safely below the Fed's 2% long-term target.
Housing has recovered
By all indications, the U.S. housing market has recuperated from its near-death experience in 2007/2008. Existing home sales are up sharply and the Case-Shiller price index has averaged 4% annual increases since 2008. Perhaps more significant for long-term trends, Americans, who had gravitated toward the rental market in the decade since the housing bubble popped in 2007/2008, are again expressing a preference for ownership over tenancy, with the most recent data showing a 702,000 year-over-year decline in the number of renters. The change in preferences could be a matter of time healing old wounds and/or a reaction to sharp increases in rents as a percentage of income over the last decade.
Risk factor: One potential drag on housing – and the broad economy – is the massive overhang of student loans. Americans have trimmed most consumer credit since the crisis, but student loan debt outstanding has climbed to more than $1.3 trillion and delinquencies remain high. Mortgage lenders are creating workarounds to qualify student loan borrowers but, more generally, the student loan burden could weigh down young Americans in what should be their prime years for economic activity.
U.S. banks look buff
Balance sheets in the U.S. banking system are currently much stronger than before the Great Recession. Profitability is up, Tier 1 Capital ratios at the four biggest money center banks are above 11.5% (versus an average of less than 8% in 2007), and the percentage of non-performing loans is declining to pre-crisis levels.
Risk factor: Loan growth has been solid, if unspectacular, but has trended down over the last two years.
Synchronized global growth
With the possible exception of the resurgent American consumer, the most striking shift since a year ago may be the breadth and scope of growth outside the U.S. For the first time since 2007, preliminary OECD data for 2017 shows no economies in recession and the most significant growth acceleration since 2010. And the biggest driver of growth outside the U.S., the Chinese economy, looks to have stabilized. China's GDP growth, which had been in a long and worrisome decline since 2009, has perked up since the second half of 2015 and today is clocking a healthy and sustainable 6.9%.
Risk factor: The shift in China's growth trajectory was brought about in part by massive leverage. As of the beginning of 2017, China's nonfinancial debt as a percentage of GDP stood at 258% versus around 150% at the end of 2008.
Central banks are backstopping growth
Globally, central banks are running generally accommodative monetary policies and continue to support financial markets with massive asset purchase programs. Collectively, the Fed, European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan own one-third of the global bond market. For its part, the Fed has begun tentatively hiking short-term rates, but the long end of the U.S. yield curve has barely moved in response, suggesting the market's mantra remains the same as ours – lower and longer – with regards to any tightening. Additionally, while the Fed has also hinted it is ready to curtail its asset purchase program by tapering reinvestment of principal and interest payments from its massive asset portfolio, other major central banks around the world have shown less interest in backing away from quantitative easing.
Risk factor: Accommodative monetary policy and quantitative easing have kept interest rates low, but they have also skewed or distorted many historical relationships. Case in point: the 10-year U.S Treasury yield is 2.06%, while the Spanish 10-year government yield is 1.52%. Is the market saying that Spain (with its 17% unemployment) is a better credit than the U.S.? Clearly relentless ECB QE purchases are keeping Spanish yields artificially low. The distortions are also evident in market volatility, where equity and bond volatility remain well below 20-year averages.
Adding to the complexity, just as the Fed looks to begin unwinding its portfolio, four key Fed seats are coming up for appointment in the coming year and there also is the question of whether President Trump will re-appoint Janet Yellen as chair (the odds of her remaining are probably 50/50, but the longer it takes for the president to resolve this question, the more likely she remains).
All central banks remain in uncharted waters with quantitative easing and the eventual need to normalize their balance sheets. For the Fed, changing the crew and the captain at such a time could be disruptive.
Bond Technicals Are Supportive
The Fed has kept yields low for an extended period of time and many investors are starved for income. Year-to-date, bond mutual fund and ETF flows have already surpassed what they were for all of 2016. These numbers reflect mostly demand from individual investors and we believe much of the demand is secular and demographics-driven, not cyclical: Boomers are retiring and need fixed income assets.
Not seen in the fund flows data, but also important is demand from pension plans and life insurance companies, two of the most yield-starved investment groups around. Our sense is that if we are correct and some upward pressure in yields develops, strong demand from these groups will keep yields from rising sharply.
While the demand side of the equation is important, so is supply, and an expected 5% decline in net spread sector issuance adds to a very favorable supply/demand technical outlook in the near future.
In summary, given the strong disinflationary forces at work around the world and the strong global demand for bonds we believe we are going to stay in this lower rate environment for an extended period.
Corporate Credit Fundamentals Are Healthy
Corporate fundamentals are solid overall. Revenues have been robust, even ticking up in recent quarters. Profits are strong as is free cash flow and cash on corporate balance sheets. While leveraging has clearly increased, it is showing signs of subsiding and much of the borrowing has been focused in higher rated sectors such as pharma and tech giants. Interest coverage has also declined, but remains at acceptable levels.
Spreads Are Tight
Demand from yield chasers has pushed spreads very tight in many sectors, particularly in high-yield and emerging market debt. While spreads have widened recently in the mortgage-backed security market, we believe they are still artificially tight due to the Fed's QE buying and don't think they adequately compensate for the risk, especially with the Fed suggesting it is ready to begin unwinding its massive, MBS-centric portfolio. Supported by solid credit fundamentals, we do still see reasonable relative value in investment grade corporates, financials in particular.
In the Baird Core Plus Bond Fund we are tilted toward quality. Only 7.1% – about a third of what our guidelines allow – is below investment grade. There is also a strong bias toward bonds from the Financials sector (nominal 22.8%, versus 9.5% in the benchmark), reflecting our long-held view that these issuers have a structural business imperative to manage their balance sheets conservatively in order to maintain their investment-grade ratings. We are underweight mortgage-backed products, given concerns about the Fed unwind.
Given the shorter duration of the portfolio, the Baird Short-Term Bond Fund is positioned a bit more aggressively in the spread products we live relative to its benchmark.
Tax-Exempt Issues Appear Fair Valued
When we look at tax-free valuations to Treasuries for the intermediate segment of the curve, we find that it is trading right at its long-term average valuation. Shorter on the curve is a bit richer, and conversely, longer maturities are a bit cheaper. The spread of BBBs versus AAAs is not as generous as a year ago, but once again remains very near long-term average levels.
Similar to our taxable funds, our two newer muni funds seek a yield advantage over their benchmarks while running duration neutral. Credit overweights are modest in the Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, and slightly more aggressive in the Baird Short-Term Municipal Fund.
We are watching closely developments on tax reform. The lack of progress on health care reform leaves tax reform as the major policy focus between now and next year's mid-term elections. Yet, despite the strong desire to get something done, accomplishing tax reform will be very difficult. Municipals have enjoyed strong performance in part because of market skepticism that meaningful reform will occur. Stay tuned!
About Baird Advisors
Baird Advisors is Baird's fixed income asset management division and advisor to the Baird Bond Funds. The group manages more than $57 billion in taxable and tax-exempt fixed income portfolios including Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund, Baird Short-Term Bond Fund, Baird Intermediate Bond Fund, Baird Aggregate Bond Fund, Baird Core Plus Bond Fund, Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund, Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, and Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund. For more information, visit www.bairdfunds.com.
Baird is an employee-owned, international wealth management, capital markets, private equity and asset management firm with offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. Established in 1919, Baird has more than 3,400 associates serving the needs of individual, corporate, institutional and municipal clients. Baird has $171 billion in client assets. Committed to being a great place to work, Baird ranked No. 4 on FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For in 2017 – its 14th consecutive year on the list. Baird is the marketing name of Baird Financial Group. Baird's principal operating subsidiaries are Robert W. Baird & Co. in the United States and Robert W. Baird Group Ltd. in Europe. Baird also has an operating subsidiary in Asia supporting Baird's investment banking and private equity operations. For more information, please visit Baird's Web site at www.rwbaird.com.
For additional information, contact:
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
In a rising interest rate environment, the value of fixed-income securities generally decline and conversely, in a falling interest rate environment, the value of fixed income securities generally increase. High yield securities may be subject to heightened market, interest rate or credit risk and should not be purchased solely because of the stated yield. Ratings are measured on a scale that ranges from AAA or Aaa (highest) to D or C (lowest). Investment grade investments are those rated from highest down to BBB- or Baa3.